Inside the Official Tully Investigation

Introduction

The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) investigation into the 1966 Tully “saucer nest” incident became one of Australia’s most detailed official examinations of a reported UFO landing trace. Rather than confirming that an unknown craft had landed, the RAAF investigation treated the event as an unresolved report in which ordinary environmental explanations remained possible. Its work focused on the physical marks in the lagoon, the condition of the vegetation, witness accounts, and laboratory testing of samples. The official conclusion was that the damaged reeds could be explained by natural causes, particularly submersion, while later researchers continued to debate whether that explanation fully accounted for the observations.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

The importance of the RAAF response lies less in proving or disproving a spacecraft claim than in showing how Australian authorities handled an unusual report in the 1960s. The case produced a rare combination of military attention, site inspection, sample analysis, and public documentation, making it a benchmark example of how UFO reports with alleged physical evidence were investigated.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

Police and RAAF response in 1966

From local report to military investigation

After banana farmer George Pedley reported seeing a disc-shaped object rise from Horseshoe Lagoon near Tully, Queensland, and finding a circular disturbance among the reeds, the matter was brought to local police attention. The report quickly moved beyond a routine witness statement because it involved an alleged physical trace rather than only an observation in the sky. Contemporary reporting recorded that police involvement led to requests for further examination and that the RAAF was asked to collect vegetation samples for testing.[Flickr]flickr.comUnidentifiable Flying ObjectsUnidentifiable Flying Objects - Page 29 | Transcription: SUN… | FlickrJanuary 23, 1966…Published: January 23, 1966

The RAAF was already the Australian government body responsible for recording and assessing many UFO reports during this period. National Archives material shows that the service maintained records of public sightings, reflecting a policy of examining reports of possible unidentified objects even when many cases were later attributed to conventional explanations.[naa.gov.au]naa.gov.auFlying saucers – fact or fiction? | naa.gov.auFlying saucers – fact or fiction? | naa.gov.au

In the Tully case, the investigation examined several questions:

The investigation therefore shifted attention away from the dramatic description of a “flying saucer” and towards measurable evidence at the site.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

Samples, interviews, and official records

What the investigators tested

A key feature of the RAAF inquiry was the collection and examination of vegetation samples from the reported “nest”. The samples were sent for specialist analysis, including examination by Queensland scientific departments. Tests considered whether the plants showed evidence of unusual effects such as burning, radiation, or other unexplained damage.[Think About It Docs]thinkaboutitdocs.comthe 1966 tully saucer nestThink About It Docs1966: The Tully Saucer Nest…

The reported laboratory findings did not identify evidence of an extraordinary event. Radioactivity results were described as insignificant, with only a small variation in one sample that was considered within normal background levels. Botanical examination concluded that the vegetation appeared consistent with death caused by submersion in swamp water rather than a physical force associated with a spacecraft.[Think About It Docs]thinkaboutitdocs.comthe 1966 tully saucer nestThink About It Docs1966: The Tully Saucer Nest…

This finding became the central point of the official explanation: the reeds were not considered to have been burned, chemically altered, or otherwise affected by an unknown mechanism. Instead, the RAAF assessment accepted that natural processes could account for the appearance of the flattened area.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

The role of witness testimony

The investigation did not dismiss the witnesses themselves. Pedley’s account remained the starting point of the case: a report of an object rising vertically from the lagoon area, followed by the discovery of a circular reed formation. The official approach was to separate the reliability of the observation from the interpretation placed on it. A person could accurately report seeing something unusual without that automatically proving the object’s nature.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

This distinction shaped the RAAF position. The investigation acknowledged that something had been reported and that unusual-looking vegetation patterns existed, but it did not find physical evidence requiring a non-conventional explanation.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

Why authorities rejected a confirmed craft

The RAAF’s refusal to classify the Tully case as evidence of a landed craft was based on the absence of confirming physical indicators. Investigators found no material residue, no measurable radiation anomaly, and no botanical evidence that required a technological cause. The available tests instead supported explanations involving ordinary environmental effects.[Think About It Docs]thinkaboutitdocs.comthe 1966 tully saucer nestThink About It Docs1966: The Tully Saucer Nest…

One alternative considered by later analysts involved severe turbulence or weather-related effects. A later University of Queensland interpretation suggested that unusual air movement associated with local weather conditions could produce patterns in vegetation similar to the reported nests. The RAAF-linked conclusion that natural causes remained plausible therefore fitted a broader effort to explain the marks through known physical processes rather than assuming an unknown vehicle.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

However, the official explanation did not end debate. Some researchers argued that aspects of the scene were difficult to reconcile with simple submersion, including the reported shape of the formation and observations made by local investigators. The disagreement was not mainly over whether the reeds existed, but over whether the known explanations fully matched the details recorded at the time.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

The lasting significance of the RAAF findings

The RAAF investigation remains central to the Tully case because it created an official evidence trail rather than leaving the incident as a purely anecdotal UFO story. It demonstrated a process familiar in many government investigations: collect statements, inspect the location, test samples, and determine whether extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.[naa.gov.au]naa.gov.auFlying saucers – fact or fiction? | naa.gov.auFlying saucers – fact or fiction? | naa.gov.au

For supporters of a UFO interpretation, the case remains notable because authorities investigated a physical trace and still could not provide a universally accepted reconstruction of exactly how the patterns formed. For sceptical investigators, the same record shows that the available evidence did not establish the presence of a spacecraft and that natural explanations were sufficient.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

The official finding was therefore cautious rather than dramatic: the Tully “saucer nest” was a documented unusual event, but the RAAF investigation did not find evidence that it was the result of an extraterrestrial or unknown craft.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP CodexUAP Codex Tully Saucer Nests · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Inside the Official Tully Investigation. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects

By Edward J. Ruppelt

The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, written by Captain Edward Ruppelt in 1956, was the first serious, unbiased account written abo...

See on Amazon

Book

The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Coverup...

By Richard Dolan

"The documentation is spectacularly good, the best ever on the UFO subject. And the conclusion is overwhelmingly powerful." —Whitley Stri...

See on Amazon

Book

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

By Carl Sagan

Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The Report on Unidentified Flying ObjectsThe UFO Experience: A Scientific InquiryUFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Coverup,

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromRAAF memorabilia oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

RAAF Signed Memorabilia Robert. B. Cowper 153rd Sqdn & D.H.Smith 126th Sqdn RARE

GBP 148.38 | Shipping GBP 34.45UsedSeller: miljo9358 (100.0% positive)Ships from: AU

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Limited Edition Anzac Biscuit Tin - Royal Australian Air Force RAAF Memorabilia

GBP 9.51 | Shipping GBP 18.60UsedSeller: declutteredgoods (100.0% positive)Ships from: AU

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Air Force E-7A Wedgetail Badge Pin & Card RAAF Aviation Memorabilia

GBP 7.63 | Shipping GBP 18.60NewSeller: magpies-apricotroses (100.0% positive)Ships from: AU

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: naa.gov.au
Title: Flying saucers – fact or fiction? | naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/blog/flying-saucers-fact-or-fiction

2. Source: flickr.com
Title: Unidentifiable Flying Objects
Link:https://www.flickr.com/photos/queenslandstatearchives/50704411782

Published: January 23, 1966

3. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/photographs

Published: April 24, 2025

4. Source: data.qld.gov.au
Link:https://www.data.qld.gov.au/dataset/aafcc517-ab90-4123-a6a7-b921f1210377

Published: May 9, 2023

5. Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/ufos/

6. Source: uapcodex.org
Title: UAP Codex [Tully Saucer Nests]({{ ‘tully-saucer-nest-incident-1966/’ | relative_url }}) · RAAF investigation · UAP Codex
Link:https://uapcodex.org/cases/tully-saucer-nests-1966/

7. Source: thinkaboutitdocs.com
Title: the 1966 tully saucer nest
Link:https://thinkaboutitdocs.com/the-1966-tully-saucer-nest/

8. Source: australianufoarchives.wordpress.com
Link:https://australianufoarchives.wordpress.com/sightings/

Published: January 21, 2018

10. Source: uapcodex.org
Title: tully saucer nests 1966
Link:https://uapcodex.org/es/cases/tully-saucer-nests-1966/

Additional References

11. Source: abc.net.au
Title: Reporting on the taboo topics of UFOs and crop circles
Link:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-16/reporting-on-taboo-topics-of-ufos-and-crop-circles/104711618

Published: December 16, 2024

12. Source: abc.net.au
Link:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-24/sugar-cane-farm-ufo-mystery-expanse-podcast-series-uncropped/104559256

Published: November 24, 2024

13. Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Link:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AReports_on_Flying_Saucers_and_other_Aerial_Objects_in_Australia%2C_A703%2C_580-1-1%2C_part_6.pdf

14. Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Link:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AReports_on_Flying_Saucers_and_other_Aerial_Objects_in_Australia%2C_A703%2C_580-1-1%2C_part_7.pdf

15. Source: stronghold-nation.com
Link:https://www.stronghold-nation.com/history/myth/the-tully-nest

16. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Unsolved Mystery of Melbourne’s UFO Encounter
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNTaTkdgN8Q

17. Source: youtube.com
Title: What Keeps Appearing in Australia’s Outback at Night Defies All Logic
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YhmgfK15Hg

18. Source: youtube.com
Title: Who Really Makes Crop Circles?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTYfnlD6jFg

19. Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Title: File:Investigations of flying saucers in Australia, A703, 569 5 451
Link:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AInvestigations_of_flying_saucers_in_Australia%2C_A703%2C_569-5-451.pdf

20. Source: ufouap.net
Title: Tully saucer nest | Global UFO Archive
Link:https://www.ufouap.net/en/cases/tully-saucer-nest