Within Todmorden Encounter
What Evidence Supports the Godfrey Case?
The documents, sketches, site observations, and later investigations reveal what evidence exists and where the case remains uncertain.
On this page
- Police report and contemporaneous sketch
- Site observations and physical claims
- Investigations and evidence limits
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The physical evidence record of the Alan Godfrey encounter is unusual because the case contains more documentation than many UFO reports, but relatively little material evidence that can be independently tested. The strongest surviving evidence is documentary: a police officer’s contemporaneous report, his sketch of the object, the recorded investigation of the location, and later research by UFO investigators. These records help establish that Godfrey reported a serious experience while on duty, but they do not by themselves prove what caused it.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
The central evidence question is therefore not whether something was reported — that is well documented — but how much weight should be given to each piece of evidence. The police paperwork and early sketch are valuable because they were created close to the event, while the alleged physical traces at the site and later recovered memories remain more difficult to verify.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
Police report and contemporaneous sketch
What was recorded at the scene?
One of the most important features of the Godfrey case is that the initial account came from a serving police officer making a report connected to his professional duties. On 28 November 1980, Alan Godfrey reported seeing a large illuminated object on Burnley Road near Todmorden while searching for stray cattle during a night shift. According to case records, he initially mistook the object for a vehicle before approaching and identifying it as something unusual.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
Godfrey’s written report and later accounts described the object as a flattened, diamond-like shape with a rotating lower section. A key part of the documentary record is that he made a sketch in his notebook during the encounter rather than producing a drawing years later. This has made the sketch one of the most frequently discussed pieces of evidence because it provides a near-contemporary record of his perception of the object’s shape and features.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
The sketch does not independently confirm the object’s nature. A drawing made by a witness records what that person believed they saw, not necessarily the physical characteristics of the thing observed. However, in evaluating the reliability of the report, the timing of the sketch matters: it reduces the possibility that later retellings alone shaped every detail of the account.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
The importance of official documentation
The existence of a police report distinguishes the Godfrey case from many informal sightings that survive only through later interviews. The report provides evidence that the event was reported promptly and that Godfrey treated it as a genuine incident rather than a story created after public attention developed.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
At the same time, official documentation should not be confused with official confirmation. A police record demonstrates that a report was made and investigated; it does not establish that the reported object was an unknown craft or that extraordinary explanations are correct. This distinction is central to assessing the case fairly.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
Site observations and physical claims
The reported road trace
The most discussed physical claim in the Godfrey case concerns the location where he said the object hovered. Accounts from investigators describe Godfrey returning to the area and observing a patch of road that appeared unusually dry despite wet conditions, with a swirling pattern on the surface. This observation became an important part of the case narrative because it suggested a possible interaction between the object and the environment.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
However, the evidential strength of this claim is limited. The observation was not preserved as a forensic sample, photographed under controlled conditions, or analysed with modern environmental testing. The record depends largely on witness descriptions and later investigation accounts. As a result, the road feature remains an interesting reported anomaly rather than a confirmed physical trace.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
Other physical claims connected to the encounter
Godfrey also reported personal effects that became part of later investigations, including damage to his boot and an unexplained mark on his leg after the reported encounter. These details contributed to the later abduction interpretation of the case, but they present the same evidential problem: there is limited independent documentation showing when or how these changes occurred.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
The physical record therefore differs from cases involving recoverable objects, photographs, radar recordings, or multiple independent witnesses. In the Godfrey encounter, the main physical claims are observations associated with the witness and location rather than objects that can be examined by outside investigators.
Investigations and evidence limits
Later investigators and competing interpretations
The case attracted attention from UFO researchers including Jenny Randles and later writers who examined the police documentation, witness testimony, and circumstances surrounding the encounter. Their work helped preserve and publicise the evidence trail, particularly the importance of the original report and sketch.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
The later investigation also introduced the controversial element of hypnotic regression, through which Godfrey described a more detailed encounter during the missing-time period. These accounts became a major part of the public story of the case, but they are generally treated with caution because memories recovered under hypnosis can be influenced by suggestion and are not considered reliable evidence on their own.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
This creates two separate evidence categories within the case:
- Contemporary evidence: the police report, the initial sketch, and the immediate account of the sighting.
- Later interpretive evidence: investigations, expanded memories, and explanations developed after the event.
The first category is stronger because it is closer in time to the reported incident. The second category is important for understanding how the case developed, but it carries greater uncertainty.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
What evidence is missing?
The biggest limitation of the Godfrey case is the absence of independent physical confirmation. There is no publicly available material object from the encounter, no photograph of the alleged craft, and no confirmed instrument record showing an unexplained object at the location. The case also relies primarily on a single main witness for the central sighting.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
This does not mean the documentation has no value. The case remains significant because it shows how a well-documented report can still leave major questions unresolved. A credible witness and a detailed record can establish that an unusual experience occurred, while still leaving open different explanations for what that experience represented.[UAP Codex]uapcodex.orgUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP CodexUAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
The evidence trail of the Alan Godfrey encounter is therefore strongest as a record of a puzzling reported event: substantial enough to support serious historical investigation, but incomplete enough that the cause of the experience remains disputed.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Evidence Supports the Godfrey Case?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, written by Captain Edward Ruppelt in 1956, was the first serious, unbiased account written abo...
UFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Coverup...
"The documentation is spectacularly good, the best ever on the UFO subject. And the conclusion is overwhelmingly powerful." —Whitley Stri...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO memorabilia oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: uapcodex.org
Title: UAP Codex Todmorden · PC Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
Link:https://uapcodex.org/cases/todmorden-godfrey-1980/
2.
Source: uapcodex.org
Title: Todmorden · agente Alan Godfrey · UAP Codex
Link:https://uapcodex.org/es/cases/todmorden-godfrey-1980/
3.
Source: exonews.org
Link:https://exonews.org/tag/alan-godfrey/
4.
Source: uap.nz
Link:https://www.uap.nz/wdk-listing/policeman-alan-godfrey-ufo/
Additional References
5.
Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3702219/media-engagement-with-acting-aaro-director-tim-phillips-on-the-historical-recor/
Source snippet
Department of Defense > TranscriptMarch 6, 2024 — MEDIA ENGAGEMENT WITH ACTING AARO DIRECTOR TIM PHILLIPS ON THE HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT...
Published: March 6, 2024
6.
Source: defense.gov
Title: DO D Report Discounts Sightings of Extraterrestrial Technology > U.S
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3701297/dod-report-discounts-sightings-of-extraterrestrial-technology/
Source snippet
Department of Defense > Defense Department NewsMarch 8, 2024 — DOD REPORT DISCOUNTS SIGHTINGS OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY March 8, 202...
Published: March 8, 2024
7.
Source: calderdalecompanion.co.uk
Title: Malcolm Bull’s Calderdale Companion: Foldout
Link:https://www.calderdalecompanion.co.uk/mmg222.html
Source snippet
July 11, 2025 — PC ALAN GODFREY * * * * * * This Foldout describes incidents involving police officer Alan Godfrey of Todmorden: * The Ad...
Published: July 11, 2025
8.
Source: questions-statements.parliament.uk
Title: uk Written questions and answers
Link:https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-12-05/18321
Source snippet
questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK ParliamentDecember 11, 2024 — Written questions, answers and state...
Published: December 11, 2024
9.
Source: questions-statements.parliament.uk
Title: uk Written questions and answers
Link:https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-07-22/69988
Source snippet
questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK ParliamentSeptember 4, 2025 — Written questions, answers and state...
Published: September 4, 2025
10.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Extra-Terrestrial Abduction of Alan Godfrey | UFO Conspiracies
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg31kbdgtJc
Source snippet
Craig Charles: UFO Conspiracies | Episode 8 | Alan Godfrey...
11.
Source: prufospolicedatabase.co.uk
Title: PRUFOS Police Database ON DUTY SIGHTINGS
Link:https://www.prufospolicedatabase.co.uk/3.html
Source snippet
PRUFOS Police DatabaseON DUTY SIGHTINGS - The PRUFOS Police Database...
12.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Craig Charles: UFO Conspiracies | Episode 8 | Alan Godfrey
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eem8siEApzU
Source snippet
The Bizarre Death of Zigmund Adamski: UFO Cover-Up or Cold Case?...
13.
Source: silviolobo.com.br
Title: The Alan Godfrey Case
Link:https://silviolobo.com.br/leitura/en/mystery/alan-godfrey-case
Source snippet
July 16, 2026 — THE ALAN GODFREY CASE Details Category: Mysteries (XV) Also available...
Published: July 16, 2026
14.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Bizarre Death of Zigmund Adamski: UFO Cover-Up or Cold Case?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkuRqikJjhA
Source snippet
Yorkshire's Strangest Small Town Mystery...


