The Sighting That Started the Modern UFO Era
Kenneth Arnold’s sighting near Mount Rainier on 24 June 1947 is widely regarded as the event that opened the modern UFO era. Arnold, a businessman and private pilot, reported seeing nine bright objects moving rapidly southwards through the Cascade Mountains.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The case is historically important, but its evidence is limited. Arnold made a detailed report, submitted a signed statement and impressed military interviewers as sincere. Yet there were no photographs, radar records, recovered materials or firmly established simultaneous witnesses to the same formation. His extraordinary speed estimate depended on uncertain judgements of distance and position made from a single moving aircraft. The strongest defensible conclusion is therefore that Arnold probably reported an experience he genuinely found anomalous, but that the surviving evidence cannot determine what he saw.
What Arnold reported seeing
Arnold was flying his CallAir aircraft from Chehalis to Yakima, Washington. He had diverted towards Mount Rainier to look for a missing United States Marine Corps transport aircraft, for which a reward had been offered. The weather was described as clear and the air unusually smooth. At roughly 9,200–9,500 feet, shortly before 3 pm, he noticed a bright flash that appeared to reflect against his aircraft.[CIA]cia.govThe Investigation of UFO'swhen a flyer made some strange observations which national news coverage and authors with a poetic license s…
Looking north of Mount Rainier, Arnold said he saw a chain of nine objects approaching the mountain. They appeared bright or silvery when reflecting sunlight and dark when silhouetted against the snow. He described them as thin, apparently tailless and arranged in a staggered, diagonal formation resembling geese or the tail of a kite. Their altitude seemed to vary as they moved along the mountainous horizon.[CIA]cia.govThe Investigation of UFO'swhen a flyer made some strange observations which national news coverage and authors with a poetic license s…
Arnold initially considered ordinary explanations. He reportedly checked whether the flashes came from his own windows, observed through an open side window and considered whether the objects might be conventional aircraft or birds. He ultimately rejected those possibilities because of their appearance, formation and apparent speed. These checks improve the quality of his account, although they do not provide independent measurements of the objects’ distance, size or velocity.[ufology.patrickgross.org]ufology.patrickgross.orgLes OVNIS vus de près: le rapport de Kenneth Arnold à l'US Army Air Forces, 1947ovni - Les OVNIS vus de près: le rapport de Kenneth Arnol…
The sighting lasted approximately two minutes. Arnold timed what he believed was the formation’s movement between the Mount Rainier and Mount Adams areas at one minute and 42 seconds. Using a distance of roughly 47 miles, later accounts calculated a speed of about 1,650–1,700 miles per hour. Contemporary newspaper reports more commonly quoted Arnold’s initial, deliberately conservative figure of approximately 1,200 miles per hour.[cia.gov]cia.govThe Investigation of UFO'swhen a flyer made some strange observations which national news coverage and authors with a poetic license s…
That distinction matters. Arnold did not measure the objects with radar or range-finding equipment. He timed apparent movement between landscape features while estimating where the objects were in three-dimensional space. His arithmetic may have been reasonable given his assumptions, but the assumptions themselves were unverified. The famous speed figure is consequently part of Arnold’s testimony, not an instrument-confirmed performance measurement.
From pilot’s story to “flying saucers”
After landing at Yakima, Arnold discussed the experience with other pilots. He later travelled to Pendleton, Oregon, where reporters Nolan Skiff and Bill Bequette of the East Oregonian interviewed him. The newspaper’s first short account appeared on 25 June, describing nine bright, “saucer-like” aircraft flying in formation at immense speed. A longer article followed on 26 June, and the Associated Press distributed the story nationally.[mail.project1947.com]mail.project1947.comPROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS: 1947PROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS: 1947 PROJECT 1947 UFO REPORTS - 1947 The beginning of the modern UFO era is o…
The familiar claim that Arnold never described anything as saucer-shaped is too simple. He later emphasised that his most famous saucer comparison concerned motion: the objects moved as a saucer might skip across water. However, surviving early reports also attributed shape comparisons such as “saucer-like”, “flat like a pie-pan” and something resembling a pie plate cut in half. His formal drawing depicted a thin object with a rounded or convex front and a tapered or truncated rear, rather than the symmetrical disc that later became standard in popular culture.[Wikipedia]WikipediaKenneth Arnold UFO sightingthumb|right|250px|On June 26, 1947, the Chicago Sun coverage of the story may have been the first use ever of the term "flying saucer"…
The phrase “flying saucer” therefore arose through compression rather than necessarily through a single clean misquotation. Arnold used several imperfect analogies for shape and movement; reporters and headline writers reduced them to a vivid two-word label. By 26 June, versions of “flying saucers” and “flying discs” were appearing in press coverage. That label subsequently influenced how later witnesses, artists and filmmakers imagined unidentified aircraft.[Wikipedia]WikipediaKenneth Arnold UFO sightingthumb|right|250px|On June 26, 1947, the Chicago Sun coverage of the story may have been the first use ever of the term "flying saucer"…
This reporting history also complicates efforts to reconstruct the objects’ appearance. Arnold’s descriptions varied between flat, disc-like, half-moon, bat-like, convex and sharply tapered forms. Some later representations emphasised a crescent or boomerang outline, while others portrayed nine conventional saucers. The surviving record supports thin, unusual silhouettes more securely than it supports one exact geometric shape.
How strong was Arnold as a witness?
Arnold was not an anonymous claimant. He was an identified businessman, a licensed pilot accustomed to mountain flying and someone willing to be questioned by journalists and military officers. Contemporary reporters found him serious, and he repeatedly acknowledged that his account sounded unbelievable. He also expressed discomfort with the publicity and asked for investigation rather than claiming certainty about extraterrestrial visitors.[project1947.com]project1947.comPROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS 1947PROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS 1947 PROJECT 1947 Pendleton, Oregon East Oregonian - June 26, 1947 Boise Flyer…
Army Air Forces investigators Captain William Davidson and Lieutenant Frank Brown interviewed Arnold in July 1947 and obtained his written statement. Their memorandum did not establish the identity of the objects, but it treated his personal integrity favourably. The investigators’ often-quoted assessment was essentially that Arnold probably saw what he said he saw, because a person of his apparent character would be unlikely to construct such an elaborate fabrication merely for attention.[Wikipedia]WikipediaKenneth Arnold UFO sightingthumb|right|250px|On June 26, 1947, the Chicago Sun coverage of the story may have been the first use ever of the term "flying saucer"…
That conclusion supports sincerity, not perceptual accuracy. Honest witnesses can misjudge angular size, distance and speed, especially when observing unfamiliar objects against a largely featureless sky. Pilots possess useful experience identifying aircraft and interpreting terrain, but aviation expertise does not remove the fundamental ambiguity of a brief, uninstrumented visual observation.
Arnold’s credibility was later complicated by his growing involvement in UFO affairs, including his association with publisher Ray Palmer and his investigation of the disputed Maury Island claims. Those later activities may affect how historians assess his judgement, but they do not by themselves show that his original June report was invented. The earliest newspaper accounts and formal statement existed before Arnold became a prominent figure in the emerging flying-saucer controversy.
Corroboration and missing physical evidence
No photograph or film of Arnold’s nine objects is known. His aircraft carried no instrument capable of measuring their range or speed, and no authenticated debris, electromagnetic trace or other physical material was linked to the sighting. The documentary evidence consists primarily of Arnold’s statements, drawings, press interviews and the records generated by military and federal attention. The National Archives preserves his report within the wider body of Air Force UFO records.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Arnold mentioned seeing a DC-4 in the area, but its crew did not become an identified corroborating witness to his formation. Contemporary reporting also referred to an unnamed man from the Ukiah area who supposedly said he had seen the same objects. Because that person was not securely identified and no detailed, independently documented statement has been established, the claim adds little evidential weight.[mail.project1947.com]mail.project1947.comPROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS: 1947PROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS: 1947 PROJECT 1947 UFO REPORTS - 1947 The beginning of the modern UFO era is o…
Other aerial-object reports occurred on or around the same date. These included accounts from different locations and, later, a widely discussed sighting by a United Airlines crew. Such reports show that Arnold’s story appeared amid a rapidly expanding wave of observations, but they do not automatically corroborate his specific Mount Rainier formation. Different reports must be compared by time, direction, appearance and location before they can be treated as observations of the same objects.[WIRED]wired.comjune 24 1947 they came from outer spacejune 24 1947 they came from outer space
The absence of physical evidence does not prove that nothing unusual was present. It does, however, sharply limit the available conclusions. There is no recoverable data set from which investigators can reconstruct a trajectory, test the claimed speed or identify a particular aircraft, bird species or atmospheric phenomenon.
What official investigators concluded
Arnold’s report preceded the creation of the United States Air Force as an independent service and also preceded its organised UFO programmes. Army Air Forces and Counter Intelligence Corps personnel nevertheless interviewed him during the summer of 1947. His case was later incorporated into the records associated with the Air Force’s successive investigation programmes. Project Sign formally began in late 1947, followed by Project Grudge and, from 1952, Project Blue Book.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesPublic Interest in UFOs Persists 50 Years After Project Blue Book Termination | National ArchivesDecember 23, 2019 — Pub…
The favourable military comments about Arnold are sometimes presented as an official endorsement of the objects’ extraordinary nature. They were not. The investigators expressed confidence that Arnold was probably reporting honestly, but they did not verify his range or speed calculations and did not identify an exotic craft. Other military commentary at the time was markedly more dismissive, suggesting mirage, hallucination, known aircraft or “silly season” excitement.[Wikipedia]WikipediaKenneth Arnold UFO sightingthumb|right|250px|On June 26, 1947, the Chicago Sun coverage of the story may have been the first use ever of the term "flying saucer"…
Nor did the FBI conduct an independent scientific resolution of the sighting. FBI records show that the bureau received reports and briefly cooperated with the military during the 1947 wave, while the armed services remained the principal investigating authority. The files document institutional interest, not confirmation of extraterrestrial technology or recovered material from Arnold’s encounter.[FBI]vault.fbi.govOpen source on fbi.gov.
Later summaries sometimes attach a simple official label such as “unidentified”, “mirage” or “insufficient data” to the Arnold case. The archival picture is less tidy: the report was retained as foundational and unresolved in identity, while different officials and later analysts offered competing conventional possibilities. No publicly documented official investigation established a definitive cause.
Conventional explanations and their limits
No single conventional explanation has won broad agreement. The principal proposals fall into four groups: aircraft, birds, meteors and atmospheric optical effects. Each can reproduce some features of the story, but none can be demonstrated from the surviving evidence.
Conventional or experimental aircraft. Arnold initially suspected jets or secret military aircraft. Early officials noted that fast P-80 fighters could produce unfamiliar appearances, but no documented flight of nine suitable aircraft has been matched to his reported route and time. Conventional aircraft also do not readily account for the reported extreme speed unless Arnold’s distance estimate was substantially wrong.[Wikipedia]WikipediaKenneth Arnold UFO sightingthumb|right|250px|On June 26, 1947, the Chicago Sun coverage of the story may have been the first use ever of the term "flying saucer"…
Birds. Skeptical writers have proposed a flock of American white pelicans or other large birds. Pelicans can fly in echelon formations, their pale undersides can flash brightly in sunlight and their profiles can look thin or crescent-like at a distance. A much closer flock would also resolve the speed problem: Arnold would have interpreted slow nearby movement as extraordinarily rapid distant movement. The difficulty is that his description of the objects passing in relation to Mount Rainier appears, if accurate, to place them much farther away than a nearby flock.[Wikipedia]WikipediaKenneth Arnold UFO sightingthumb|right|250px|On June 26, 1947, the Chicago Sun coverage of the story may have been the first use ever of the term "flying saucer"…
Mirages or distorted mountain features. Atmospheric refraction over mountainous terrain can displace, stretch or multiply distant images. Temperature inversions can make peaks or snowfields appear detached and can produce bright, mobile-looking forms as the observer’s aircraft changes position. Mirage theories therefore address the setting and lack of physical evidence. They must nevertheless explain Arnold’s impression of nine discrete bodies travelling in formation and producing repeated flashes.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgOpen source on skepticalinquirer.org.
Meteors or fragments. A group of meteoric objects could appear bright, fast and aligned, but the reported two-minute duration, apparent weaving and movement near a mountainous horizon are poor fits for most meteor events. The proposal remains speculative because no astronomical observation or recovered meteorite connects such an event to Arnold’s time and location.
All these explanations expose the same central weakness in the case: distance was inferred, not measured. A nearby object could have been small and slow; a distant object would have needed to be large and extremely fast. With only one observing position, there was no triangulation to distinguish those possibilities.
The most balanced assessment
Arnold’s report has several strengths. It was made promptly, the witness was identifiable and experienced, the principal details were recorded in contemporary newspapers, and a more formal written account followed within weeks. Military interviewers considered him personally credible, and there is no persuasive evidence that the original sighting was an intentional hoax.[project1947.com]mail.project1947.comPROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS: 1947PROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS: 1947 PROJECT 1947 UFO REPORTS - 1947 The beginning of the modern UFO era is o…
Its weaknesses are equally important. Arnold was the sole well-documented observer of the specific formation; the objects were not photographed or detected by instruments; his speed depended on uncertain distance estimates; and his descriptions evolved as reporters, investigators and Arnold himself tried to express an unfamiliar visual experience. Later retellings often harden uncertain details into facts, particularly the precise shape, distance and 1,700-mile-per-hour velocity.
The case therefore supports a narrower conclusion than either ridicule or extraterrestrial certainty. Kenneth Arnold almost certainly made a sincere report of nine aerial appearances that he could not identify. The records do not show that he saw alien spacecraft, secret aircraft or any other specific object. They preserve an unresolved visual observation whose cultural consequences became far more definite than its physical evidence.
Why this sighting became the modern UFO starting point
Unexplained aerial observations had been reported long before 1947. Arnold’s sighting became a historical dividing line because it combined a named pilot, dramatic estimated speed, recognisable geography and rapid national distribution through the press. It appeared at a moment when jet propulsion, guided missiles, atomic weapons and Cold War secrecy had made extraordinary aircraft seem newly plausible.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesPublic Interest in UFOs Persists 50 Years After Project Blue Book Termination | National ArchivesDecember 23, 2019 — Pub…
Within days, newspapers were receiving reports of discs and saucers from across the United States. The publicity did not prove that those reports shared one cause; it created a common vocabulary through which people interpreted and reported unusual things in the sky. The resulting wave helped prompt military concern about misidentification, foreign technology, public alarm and possible air-defence implications.[FBI]vault.fbi.govOpen source on fbi.gov.
Arnold’s lasting significance is thus documentary and cultural as much as evidential. His experience generated the first widely circulated case narrative of the post-war UFO era, produced an enduring term and helped establish the pattern that would define later controversies: a credible witness, an extraordinary performance claim, incomplete measurements, competing conventional explanations and an official record that documented interest without delivering a conclusive identity.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to The Sighting That Started the Modern UFO Era. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, written by Captain Edward Ruppelt in 1956, was the first serious, unbiased account written abo...
Watch the Skies! A Chronicle of the Flying Saucer Myth
Narrates the belief in alien visitors to the earth since the 1940s, when their spacecraft began to be described consistently as saucer sh...
The Coming of the Saucers
This is the story that started The Modern UFO Era. On June 24,1947 Kenneth Arnold, a respected businessman and pilot, was searching Mt. R...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromaviation art print oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary
Source snippet
National ArchivesPublic Interest in UFOs Persists 50 Years After Project Blue Book Termination | National ArchivesDecember 23, 2019 — Pub...
Published: December 23, 2019
2.
Source: mail.project1947.com
Link:https://mail.project1947.com/fig/1947a.htm
Source snippet
PROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS: 1947PROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS: 1947 PROJECT 1947 UFO REPORTS - 1947 The beginning of the modern UFO era is o...
3.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/Investigation-of-UFOs.pdf
Source snippet
The Investigation of UFO'swhen a flyer made some strange observations which national news coverage and authors with a poetic license s...
4.
Source: wired.com
Title: 0624first flying saucer sighting
Link:https://www.wired.com/2011/06/0624first-flying-saucer-sighting
Source snippet
Outer Space?On June 24, 1947, pilot Kenneth Arnold sighted a series of unidentified flying objects near Mount Rainier, Washington, markin...
Published: June 24, 1947
5.
Source: project1947.com
Link:https://www.project1947.com/fig/1947b.htm
Source snippet
PROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS 1947PROJECT 1947 - UFO REPORTS 1947 PROJECT 1947 Pendleton, Oregon East Oregonian - June 26, 1947 Boise Flyer...
Published: June 26, 1947
6.
Source: ufology.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufology.patrickgross.org/htm/arnoldrepaff.htm
Source snippet
Les OVNIS vus de près: le rapport de Kenneth Arnold à l'US Army Air Forces, 1947ovni - Les OVNIS vus de près: le rapport de Kenneth Arnol...
7.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Arnold_UFO_sighting
Source snippet
thumb|right|250px|On June 26, 1947, the Chicago Sun coverage of the story may have been the first use ever of the term "flying saucer"...
Published: June 26, 1947
8.
Source: time.com
Title: This Is Why People Think UFOs Look Like ‘Flying Saucers’On
Link:https://time.com/3930602/first-reported-ufo/
9.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/arnoldrepcic.htm
10.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
11.
Source: wired.com
Title: june 24 1947 they came from outer space
Link:https://www.wired.com/2008/06/june-24-1947-they-came-from-outer-space
12.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/UFO
13.
Source: wired.com
Title: how ufo sightings became an american obsession
Link:https://www.wired.com/story/how-ufo-sightings-became-an-american-obsession
14.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections
15.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download
16.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/textual-and-microfilm
17.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/publications
18.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Do Records Show Proof of UFOs? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
19.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Air Force Records | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force
20.
Source: newspapers.com
Title: Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting
Link:https://www.newspapers.com/article/corvallis-gazette-times-kenneth-arnold-u/54076142/
21.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: saucers over washington the history of project blue book
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2019/12/19/saucers-over-washington-the-history-of-project-blue-book/
22.
Source: visit.archives.gov
Title: gov50 Years Ago: Government Stops Investigating UFOs | National Archives Museum
Link:https://visit.archives.gov/whats-on/explore-exhibits/50-years-ago-government-stops-investigating-ufos
23.
Source: archives.gov
Title: 50 Years Ago: Government stops investigating UFOs | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2020/nr20-19
24.
Source: cia.gov
Title: FLYIN G SAUCERS | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp81r00560r000100020013-6
25.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/foia/ufos.html
26.
Source: history.com
Title: u s air force closes the book on ufos 45 years ago
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/u-s-air-force-closes-the-book-on-ufos-45-years-ago
27.
Source: cia.gov
Title: HIG H-TECH ESPIONAGE | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00965r000707000002-9
28.
Source: cia.gov
Title: FLYIN G SAUCERS | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0005515931
29.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0005517742
30.
Source: history.com
Title: Kenneth Arnold
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/kenneth-arnold
31.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: Roswell UFO
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/Roswell%20UFO?pubDate=20260120
32.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/UFO?source=post_page—————————
33.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/UFO/UFO%20Part%2005/at_download/file
34.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/National%20Investigations%20Committee%20on%20Aerial%20Phenomena%20%28NICAP%29/National%20Investigations%20Committee%20on%20Aerial%20Phenomena%20%28NICAP%29%20Part%2001/at_download/file
35.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/rosenberg-case/julius-rosenberg/Julius%20Rosenberg%20Batch%2031/view
36.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/file-repository/archives/july-1947.pdf/view
37.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: UFO Part 11
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/UFO/UFO%20Part%2011
38.
Source: archives.fbi.gov
Title: the fbi and ufos flying flapjacks saucers and saw blades
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2010/april/ufos_040610/the-fbi-and-ufos-flying-flapjacks-saucers-and-saw-blades
39.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: FOIA Log 2023 Part 01 (Final)
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/foia-log-2023/FOIA%20Log%202023%20Part%2001%20%28Final%29
40.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/more-fbi-services-and-information/freedom-of-information-privacy-act/vault
41.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/foia
42.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00965R000707000002-9.pdf
43.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100020013-6.pdf
44.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005516115.pdf
45.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0000015477
46.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000015338.pdf
47.
Source: cia.gov
Title: DOC 0005515931
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005515931.pdf
48.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000015477.pdf
49.
Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/172220b0.pdf
50.
Source: ufology.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufology.patrickgross.org/htm/arnoldrepcic.htm
51.
Source: oregonlive.newspapers.com
Title: the oregonian
Link:https://oregonlive.newspapers.com/paper/the-oregonian/39619/?tab=browse
52.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Kenneth Arnold
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Arnold
53.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Flight 105 UFO sighting
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_105_UFO_sighting
54.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Rhodes UFO photographs
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodes_UFO_photographs
55.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2014/05/mount-rainier-saucer-magnet/
56.
Source: rr0.org
Link:https://rr0.org/time/1/9/6/7/Bloecher_Report1947UfoWave/s1/arnold/
Additional References
57.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqJzZ-V5Jv8
Source snippet
Kenneth Arnold and the First UFOs - Jimmy Akin's Mysterious World...
58.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The First UFO Sighting In America | UFOs: The Lost Evidence
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJp-YR34XBs
Source snippet
UFO Files #1: The First UFO: The Keneth Arnold Case - 1947...
59.
Source: si.edu
Link:https://www.si.edu/object/account-kenneth-arnolds-sighting-unexplained-flying-objects-press-reports-used-words-flying-saucer%3Aslasro_165599
60.
Source: uap-files.org
Link:https://www.uap-files.org/blog/kenneth-arnold-fbi-file/
61.
Source: nowdeclassified.com
Link:https://www.nowdeclassified.com/incidents/kenneth-arnold-1947
62.
Source: disclosdex.com
Link:https://disclosdex.com/documents/1947-kenneth-arnold-mount-rainier-case-file
63.
Source: managingexpectations.net
Link:https://managingexpectations.net/blog/articles/kenneth-arnold-flying-saucers-evidence.html
64.
Source: theufodatabase.com
Link:https://theufodatabase.com/docs/kenneth-arnold-1947-07-12-kenneth-arnold-letter-and-drawing
65.
Source: uap-files.org
Link:https://www.uap-files.org/blog/maury-island-incident-fbi-files/
66.
Source: usubjects.com
Link:https://usubjects.com/article/inside-the-first-major-ufo-sighting-in-american-history-mental-floss-2896